Staff
- Jackie Barocio
-
(916) 319-8333
Child Care, Expanded Learning, School Facilities, and Teachers - Sara Cortez
-
(916) 319-8348
Special Education, Preschool, and Child Nutrition - Kenneth Kapphahn
-
(916) 319-8339
Proposition 98, School District Budgets, School Transportation - Lisa Qing
-
(916) 319-8306
California State University, Student Financial Aid - Paul Steenhausen
-
(916) 319-8303
California Community Colleges - Ian Klein
-
(916) 319-8336
University of California; College of the Law, San Francisco; California State Library - Michael Alferes
-
(916) 319-8338
Local Control Funding Formula, Charter Schools, Alternative Schools, High School Career Technical Education - Edgar Cabral
-
(916) 319-8343
Deputy Legislative Analyst: K-12 Education - Jennifer Pacella
-
(916) 319-8332
Deputy Legislative Analyst: Higher Education
Publications
Education
To browse all LAO publications, visit our Publications page.
School Accountability: Changes to State and Federal Systems
- Format:
February 24, 2016 - Presented to Senate Education Committee
The 2016-17 Budget: Analysis of Child Care and Preschool Proposals
February 24, 2016 - In this report, we analyze the Governor’s child care and preschool proposals. The report includes (1) a high-level overview of the proposed child care and preschool budget, and (2) an assessment of the Governor's proposals to restructure California's child care and preschool programs. At the end of the report, we provide a summary of our recommendations.
Overview of Proposition 98 Budget Proposals
- Format:
February 23, 2016 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
Budget Outlook (Presentation)
- Format:
- PowerPoint
February 19, 2016 - California County Superintendents Educational Services Association-February 19, 2016
The 2016-17 Budget: Proposition 98 Education Analysis
February 18, 2016 - In this report, we cover the Governor's estimates of the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee, his overall Proposition 98 spending package, and his specific Proposition 98 proposals. We also provide in-depth analysis of the Governor's proposals for the Local Control Funding Formula, preschool, education mandates, special education, county offices of education, and the High Speed Network. In addition, we include an analysis of teacher workforce trends and we highlight several issues for the Legislature to consider when exploring potentially new workforce policies.
The 2016-17 Budget: Review of UC’s Merced Campus Expansion Proposal
February 10, 2016 - In November 2015, the Regents of the University of California (UC) approved a proposal to enter into a public–private partnership to double the physical size of the Merced campus. Under the plan, enrollment on the Merced campus would grow from 6,000 to 10,000 full–time equivalent (FTE) students by 2020. This brief is intended to assist the Legislature in reviewing this proposal. In it, we provide background on the Merced campus and the state process for approving capital outlay projects at UC, describe key aspects of the proposed project, and raise four key issues for the Legislature to consider.
Overview of Community College Basic Skills Programs
- Format:
February 5, 2016 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
Overview of Tuition-Free Community College Programs
- Format:
February 3, 2016 - Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
CCC Student Success: History, Funding, and Issues for Legislative Consideration
- Format:
February 3, 2016 - Presented to: Senate Education Committee
A Review of the CalSTRS Funding Plan: Recent Policy Change Increases District Rates
- Format:
- HTML
February 2, 2016 - This post is the seventh in a series looking at the implementation of the CalSTRS funding plan. In this post, we describe how a recent CalSTRS policy change increases projected district rates under many scenarios.
A Review of the CalSTRS Funding Plan: Funding Plan May Not Meet Principle of “Shared Responsibility”
- Format:
- HTML
February 2, 2016 - This post is the sixth in a series looking at the implementation of the CalSTRS funding plan. In this post, we describe how the plan might fall short of meeting the principle of “shared responsibility,” a key goal of the Legislature in passing the plan. Specifically, we explain how the state may not incur higher costs under the funding plan.
A Review of the CalSTRS Funding Plan: State’s Future Responsibility for CalSTRS Uncertain
- Format:
- HTML
February 2, 2016 - This post is the fifth in a series looking at the implementation of the CalSTRS funding plan. In this post, we describe how the state’s share of CalSTRS’ unfunded liabilities will be more sensitive to investment gains and losses than the district share.
A Review of the CalSTRS Funding Plan: Treatment of Teacher Contributions Also Increase District Unfunded Liabilities
- Format:
- HTML
February 2, 2016 - This post is the fourth in a series looking at the implementation of the CalSTRS funding plan. Our third post explained how theoretical asset gains have increased the school and community college district share of CalSTRS’ unfunded liabilities. In this post, we continue this discussion by describing how CalSTRS’ treatment of teacher contributions has also increased the district share.
A Review of the CalSTRS Funding Plan: Theoretical Investment Gains Have Shifted Unfunded Liabilities to Districts
- Format:
- HTML
February 2, 2016 - This post is the third in a series looking at the implementation of the CalSTRS funding plan. In this post, we describe how the abstract calculation upon which the funding plan is based has increased the district share of CalSTRS’ unfunded liabilities while decreasing the state share.