Submitted July 17, 2008
Proposition 1
Safe, Reliable High-Speed
Passenger Train Bond Act
For the 21st Century.
Background
Urban, Commuter, and Intercity Rail.
California is served by various types of passenger rail services that include
urban, commuter, and intercity rail services. Urban and commuter rail services
primarily serve local and regional transportation needs. Examples include
services provided by Bay Area Rapid Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area,
Sacramento Regional Transit light rail, Metrolink in Southern California, and
the San Diego Trolley. These services are generally planned by local or regional
governments and are funded with a combination of local, state, and federal
monies.
Intercity rail services primarily serve business or
recreational travelers over longer distances between cities as well as between
regions in California and other parts of the country. Currently, the state funds
and contracts with Amtrak to provide intercity rail service, with trains that
travel at maximum speeds of up to about 90 miles per hour. There are intercity
rail services in three corridors: the Capitol Corridor service from San Jose to
Auburn, the San Joaquin service from Oakland to Bakersfield, and the Pacific
Surfliner service from San Diego to San Luis Obispo. None of the existing
state-funded intercity rail services provide train service between northern
California and southern California.
High-Speed Rail. Currently California does
not have a high-speed intercity passenger rail system that provides service at
sustained speeds of 200 miles per hour or greater. In 1996, the state created
the California High-Speed Rail Authority (the authority) to develop an intercity
rail system that can operate at speeds of 200 miles per hour or faster to
connect the major metropolitan areas of California, and provide service between
northern California and southern California.
Over the past 12 years, the authority has spent about
$60 million for pre-construction activities, such as environmental studies and
planning, related to the development of a high-speed rail system. The proposed
system would use electric trains and connect the major metropolitan areas of San
Francisco, Sacramento, through the Central Valley, into Los Angeles, Orange
County, the Inland Empire (San Bernardino and Riverside Counties), and San
Diego. The authority estimated in 2006 that the total cost to develop and
construct the entire high-speed rail system would be about $45 billion. While
the authority plans to fund the construction of the proposed system with a
combination of federal, private, local, and state monies, no funding has yet
been provided.
Proposal
This measure authorizes the state to sell $9.95 billion
in general obligation bonds to fund (1) pre-construction activities and
construction of a high-speed passenger rail system in California, and (2)
capital improvements to passenger rail systems that expand capacity and/or
enable train riders to connect to the high-speed rail system. The bond funds
would be available when appropriated by the Legislature. General obligation
bonds are backed by the state, meaning that the state is required to pay the
principal and interest costs on these bonds.
For more information regarding general obligation bonds,
please refer to the section of this ballot pamphlet entitled “An Overview of
State Bond Debt.”
The High-Speed Rail System. Of the total
amount, $9 billion would be used, together with any available federal monies and
funds from other sources, to develop and construct a segment of the high-speed
train system from the San Francisco Transbay Terminal to Los Angeles Union
Station. The bond proceeds from this measure may be used to acquire
right-of-way, trains, and related equipment, and to construct tracks,
structures, power systems, and stations. However, bond proceeds may be used to
provide only up to one-half of the total cost of construction of tracks and
stations. The measure requires the authority to seek private and other public
funds to cover the remaining costs.
After construction of the San Francisco to Los Angeles
segment is fully funded, any remaining bond funds may then be used to plan and
construct any of the following additional segments:
Other Passenger Rail Systems. The remaining
$950 million in bond funds would be available to fund capital projects that
improve other passenger rail systems in order to enhance these systems’ capacity
and/or allow riders to connect to the high-speed rail system. Of the
$950 million, $190 million is designated to improve the state’s intercity rail
services. The remaining $760 million would be used for other passenger rail
services including urban and commuter rail.
Fiscal Effect
Bond Costs. The costs of these bonds would
depend on interest rates in effect at the time they are sold and the time period
over which they are repaid. The state would make principal and interest payments
from the state’s General Fund over a period of about 30 years. If the bonds are
sold at an average interest rate of 5 percent, the cost would be about
$19.4 billion to pay off both principal ($9.95 billion) and interest
($9.5 billion). The average repayment for principal and interest would be about
$647 million per year.
Operating Costs. When constructed, the
high-speed rail system will incur unknown ongoing maintenance and operation
costs, probably in excess of $1 billion a year. Depending on the level of
ridership, these costs would be at least partially offset by revenue from fares
paid by passengers.
Return to Propositions
Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page