Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Resources and Transportation Hon. Richard Bloom, Chair

Presented to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee, Hon. Mark DeSaulnier, Chair and Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 2 On Resources, Environmental Protection, Energy and Transportation, Hon. Jim Beall, Chair

Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Program Chapter 942, Statutes of 1995 (SB 537, Hughes)

Presented to: Assembly Insurance Committee Hon. Henry T. Perea, Chair and Senate Insurance Committee Hon. Ron Calderon, Chair

Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 6 On Budget Process, Oversight and Program Evaluation. Hon. Bob Blumenfield, Chair.

Presented to: Assembly Transportation Committee

Strategy for Reviewing the Draft 2012 High-Speed Rail Authority Business Plan

Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Program

Presented to: Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Hon. Mark DeSaulnier, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee Hon. Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair

Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Resources and Transportation. January 26, 2011.

Current law requires the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) to report annually to the Legislature certain information related to real estate fraud cases in counties that participate in the Real Estate Fraud Prosecution Trust Fund Program. The report must also include information on the types of expenditures made by the law enforcement agencies of those counties. Our review found that, by 2009-10, 21 counties had reported data indicating their participation in the program at an annual statewide cost of about $10 million, with significant variation in expenditures from county to county. In this report, we further analyze this data and offer recommendations to clarify a 10 percent cap on administrative costs incurred in the program as well as to modify the current program reporting requirements.

Presented to: Senate Transportation and Housing Committee and the Senate Local Government Committee. September 22, 2010.

Presented to Budget Conference Committee

Presented to: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Hon. Denise Moreno Ducheny, Chair

Presented to: Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Hon. Alan Lowenthal, Chair

Presented to: Assembly Transportation Committee, Hon. Mike Eng, Chair

Presented to Budget Conference Committee

Presented to Budget Conference Committee Budget Conference Committee

Presented to: Senate Transportation and Housing Committee

Presented to Assembly Transportation Committee

Presented to: Assembly Transportation Committee

Conference information for Item 2740 of the 2008 Budget Conference Committee (page 117).

Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Transportation

Presented to the Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 4 on Transportation Hon. Mike Machado, Chair

Presented by Elizabeth Hill to the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee, November 27, 2007.

Presented to the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee

Presented to Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 4 on Transportation

Presented to Assembly Housing and Community Development

Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on Transportation.

Presented to Assembly Transportation Committee and Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5

Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 3

Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 4

Presented to the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 4

We review infrastructure proposals in the Strategic Growth Initiative related to transportation. Presented to the Assembly Transportation Committee, Hon. Jenny Oropeza, Chair

We review infrastructure issues related to housing. Presented to Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee.

Presented to the Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on March 30, 2005.

This is assessment of the Governor's Traffic Congestion Relief Plan presented to the Conference Committee on Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Development. The assessment identifies a number of issues that require legislative consideration, including: the need for ongoing funding, local flexibility in the use of funds, and coordination with air quality programs.