December 10, 2013

Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed statutory initiative regarding vehicle-related consumer protection laws (A.G. File No. 13‑0035).

Background

Safety Recall Laws. Current federal law specifies when and how manufacturers must provide notification to vehicle owners, dealers, and distributors about safety recalls. Beginning in August 2014, major vehicle manufacturers will be required to regularly post information on their websites regarding safety recalls. Additionally, federal law requires manufacturers to pay for repairs related to safety recalls on vehicles that are no more than ten years old on the date the defect is determined. In addition, the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) investigates consumer complaints against car dealers.

Taxes Associated With Vehicle Sales. The sale of vehicles directly or indirectly affects state and local tax revenues. In particular, the sales tax and vehicle license fee are collected on the sale price or market value of vehicles. In addition, the profits of car dealers and financial institutions affect the state’s income and corporation tax revenues.

Proposal

The measure prohibits car dealers and rental car companies from selling or leasing a used vehicle if they knew or should have known that the vehicle was subject to a manufacturer’s safety recall without first making the repair. This provision does not apply to the sale of used vehicles by private sellers or between car dealers, rental companies, or manufacturers.

Fiscal Effects

This measure would likely have various fiscal effects on state and local governments, many of which are subject to substantial uncertainty.

Effect on Taxes Associated With Vehicles. This measure could affect dealers’ profits, dealers’ employees’ incomes, and prices and quantities of vehicles sold, and, therefore, the amount of tax revenue collected by state and local governments. However, the total effect on government revenues is unclear, as is whether the net result would be increased or decreased tax revenues. This uncertainty is because the measure could have different effects, in part, depending on how the industry and consumers respond.

Specifically, the requirement to perform safety recall repairs would result in additional costs to car dealers associated with tasks such as checking for recalls and transporting vehicles to dealers for the necessary repairs. At least some of these additional costs would likely be passed on to customers in the form of higher prices, which would increase sales tax revenues associated with these sales. Increased prices, however, would lead some customers to change their buying decisions such as by purchasing fewer cars, which would reduce sales tax revenues. Customers could also purchase more used cars from private parties rather than dealers, which could reduce sales tax revenues because private party transaction prices tend to be lower and potentially easier to underreport. On the other hand, to the degree that consumers value safety recall repairs, improved consumer confidence could increase, offsetting the reduction in car sales and associated taxes from dealerships. Furthermore, these provisions could also affect revenue from a variety of other taxes.

Effect on Enforcement and Adjudication Costs. The measure creates a new legal requirement for car dealers. Consequently, state courts would likely experience some additional caseload associated with hearing civil cases brought by consumers alleging violations by dealers. Also, the DMV could experience some additional workload associated with conducting investigations and enforcement actions related to allegations of violations of this requirement. These court and DMV costs will likely not be significant.

Summary of Fiscal Effects. This measure would have the following fiscal effect:



Return to Initiatives
Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page