To browse all LAO publications, visit our Publications page.
April 6, 2016 -
Chapter 620 of 2012 (AB 970, Fong) requires the University of California (UC) and the California State University (CSU) to fulfill the following three requirements related to systemwide tuition and fee increases:
As detailed below, our review found UC was not in compliance with several provisions of Chapter 620. Though the legislation deems its provisions to be required for UC, UC believes it is not legally obligated to comply because of its constitutional autonomy. We found CSU complied with all Chapter 620 provisions except for one reporting requirement.
April 5, 2016 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
April 4, 2016 - Presented to: California Community College (CCC) Financial Aid Directors, April 4, 2016.
March 30, 2016 - Presented to: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
March 29, 2016 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
March 17, 2016 - Through a complex, often convoluted, process that has engendered much discussion and disagreement over the years, the state must reimburse local governments for their activities to implement certain state mandates. State law requires the Commission on State Mandates (CSM) to determine whether new state laws, executive orders, or regulations affecting local governments create state-reimbursable mandates. Generally, local governments may submit claims for state mandate payment based on one of two methods: (1) claiming of actual costs or (2) a reasonable reimbursement methodology (RRM). A budget trailer bill proposal from the administration would change the requirements for developing an RRM. We recommend the Legislature reject this proposal and perhaps consider targeted alternatives.
March 14, 2016 - This brief is intended to assist the Legislature in reviewing the Governor’s proposal for zero-textbook-cost degrees. We provide background on open educational resources (OER), describe California efforts to encourage their use, and highlight zero–textbook–cost degree initiatives currently underway in other states. We then describe the Governor’s proposal and provide our associated assessment and recommendations.
March 10, 2016 - Presented to: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
March 10, 2016 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
March 8, 2016 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
March 3, 2016 - Presented to: Senate Budget Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
February 29, 2016 - Presented to: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee
February 26, 2016 - In this report, we provide background on three key areas of higher education in California: enrollment, tuition and financial aid, and institutional performance. We then analyze specific budget proposals for the University of California, California State University, California Community Colleges, Hastings College of the Law, and California Student Aid Commission, making corresponding recommendations for the Legislature's consideration.
February 24, 2016 - Presented to Senate Education Committee
February 24, 2016 - In this report, we analyze the Governor’s child care and preschool proposals. The report includes (1) a high-level overview of the proposed child care and preschool budget, and (2) an assessment of the Governor's proposals to restructure California's child care and preschool programs. At the end of the report, we provide a summary of our recommendations.