LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Senate Committee
|
|||
Issue |
Governor |
Action |
Fiscal Impact |
Judicial/Executive |
|||
Trial Court Funding |
|||
• Juror fees | • Increased fees from $5 | • Increased fees to $25 per day. | • $28.4 million cost. |
per day to $12 per day. | |||
K-12 Education |
|||
Funding level | • Appropriates | • Increased Proposition 98 spending | • $1.3 billion cost. |
$257 million above the | by $1.3 billion above Governor's | ||
Proposition 98 guaran- | budget. | ||
tee in the budget year. | |||
Revenue limits | • Funds revenue limits at | • Provides $505 million for deficit re- | • $1 billion cost |
statutory levels. | duction and | (included above). | |
• $495 million for PERS rate buyback. | |||
Higher Education |
|||
University of | • Increases budget by | • Augmented to reduce summer fees | • $12.2 million |
California | 12.1 percent for various | and increase maintenance. | ongoing cost. |
purposes. | • $30 million one-time | ||
cost. | |||
California State | • Increases budget by | • Augmented to reduce summer fees, | • $37.4 million |
University | 8.7 percent for various | increase compensation by 1 percent, | ongoing cost. |
purposes. | and cover costs at Channel Islands | • $42.8 million | |
and Stockton. | one-time cost. | ||
California | • Increases budget by | • Augmented for Partnership for Ex- | • $252 million |
Community | 6.7 percent for various | cellence, equalization funding, and | ongoing cost. |
Colleges | purposes. | equipment and library materials. | • $113.5 million |
one-time cost. | |||
Student Aid | • Increases budget by | • Augmented to increase number of | • $118 million |
Commission | 19 percent. | awards, raise award amounts, and | ongoing cost. |
restore Cal Grant T Program. | |||
Health and Social Services |
|||
COLAs and | • Provided selected in- | • Provided various additional COLAs | • $279.3 million cost. |
provider rates | creases. | and rate increases (see separate | |
table). | |||
Medi-Cal--Eligibility | • No changes proposed. | • Reduced eligibility reporting interval | • $46.6 million cost. |
for families and | from quarterly to semiannual, elimi- | ||
children | nated asset limit, and covered for- | ||
mer foster care children. | |||
Medi-Cal--Eligibility | • Increases income limit to | • Increased income limit to | • $21.1 million cost. |
for elderly, blind, | 100 percent of poverty | 133 percent of poverty level. | |
and disabled. | level. |
Health and Social Services
|
|||
General mental | • Provides $290 million | • Set aside funds for in- | • $200 million cost. |
health treatment | General Fund for com- | creased mental health treat- | |
munity mental health | ment services. | ||
treatment. | |||
Mental health--various | • Continues base fund- | • Augmented funding (see | • $110.9 million cost. |
community services | ing. | Health table for list of spe- | |
cific major increases). | |||
Federal TANF Funds | • Provides TANF reserve | • Reduced TANF spending | • Increases TANF |
Reserve | of $45.5 million. | due to overbudgeting, | reserve by |
$124.6 million. a | |||
thereby increasing TANF | |||
reserve. | |||
SSI/SSP--Cash Assis- | • Follows current law | • Eliminates sunset of ex- | • No impact in budget |
tance Program for | whereby expanded | panded program for post- | year. |
Immigrants | program for post- | August 1996 immigrants. | • Cost of roughly |
August 1996 immi- | $100 million in | ||
grants sunsets in Sep- | 2001-02, increasing | ||
tember 2000. | significantly thereafter. | ||
In-Home Supportive | • No proposal. | • Augmented by $50 million to | • $50 million cost. |
Services--Health benefits | provide health benefits for | ||
for service providers | uninsured service providers. | ||
Youth and Adult Corrections
|
|||
Department of Corrections |
|||
• Services and supervi- | • No proposal. | • Augmented to provide | • $34.6 million cost. |
sion enhancements for | variety of enhancements. | ||
inmates and parolees | |||
• Inmate and parole | • Proposed full funding. | • Reduced request to reflect | • $14 million savings. |
caseload | more recent trends. | ||
Board of Corrections |
|||
• Construction of county | • No proposal. | • Augmented to use federal | • $40 million cost |
juvenile detention | funds for county facilities. | (federal funds). | |
facilities | |||
• Grants for local law | • No proposal. | • Augmented to expand exist- | • $65.5 million cost. |
enforcement programs | ing and establish new | ||
programs. | |||
Office of Criminal Justice
|
Planning |
||
• Local law enforcement | • Provides $100.2 million | • Rejected. | • $100.2 million savings. |
equipment grants | for competitive grants. | ||
a Federal Temporary Assistance for Needy | Families (TANF) funds. |
Resources |
|||
Air Resources Board-- | • $9.9 million (special funds | • Various augmentations. | • $100 million cost. |
diesel emissions reduction | in Energy Commission and | ||
programs; alternative fuel | DGS) for alternative fuel | ||
infrastructure | infrastructure. | ||
Department of Fish and | • Provides $79.9 million for | • Augmented by $31.6 million | • $31.6 million cost. |
Game--support | support of various pro- | (203 personnel-years) for | |
grams. | various activities. | ||
Local flood control | • Provides $44 million. | • Augmented by $68 million. | • $68 million cost. |
subventions | |||
Water storage studies | • Provides $20 million. | • Denied proposal. | • $20 million savings. |
Other |
|||
Local Government | • No proposal. | • Provided $1.5 billion in | • $1.5 billion cost. |
Fiscal Relief | various subventions and | ||
competitive grants to local | |||
governments. | |||
California Teachers | • Appropriates $50 million in | • Approved as budgeted. | • -- |
Homebuyers Assistance | one-time funds for teacher | ||
Program | downpayment assistance. | ||
Sustainable agriculture | • Provides $1 million to be | • Augmented by $5.2 million | • $12 million cost. |
research grants | allocated by Department of | (and an additional | |
Pesticide Regulation | $6.8 million in the Depart- | ||
($1.5 million all funds). | ment of Food and Agricul- | ||
ture). | |||
Employee Compensation | • Provided $30 million for | • Approved as budgeted. | • -- |
unspecified employee com- | |||
pensation adjustments | |||
Tax Proposals | • Proposes nine benefit | • Incorporated Governor's | • $167 million cost. |
changes. | proposals. |
(In Millions)
Governor's | Senate | ||
Budget | Committee | ||
(January 10) | Action | Difference | |
Starting balance July 1, 2000 |
$3,012
|
$4,793
|
$1,781
|
Revenues and transfers |
68,236
|
70,374
|
2,138
|
Total resources available |
$71,249
|
$75,168
|
$3,919
|
Expenditures |
$68,819
|
$73,418
|
$4,599
|
Ending fund balance June 30, 2001 |
$2,430
|
$1,749
|
-$681
|
Encumbrances |
$592
|
$592
|
--
|
Set-asides |
600
|
600
|
--
|
Reserve |
$1,238
|
$557
|
-$681
|
Detail may not total due to rounding. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
(In Millions)
Governor's | Senate | ||
Budget | Committee | ||
(January 10) | Action | Difference | |
General Fund |
$68,819
|
$73,418
|
$4,599
|
Special funds a |
16,301
|
16,355
|
44
|
Budget totals |
$85,130
|
$89,774
|
$4,644
|
Selected bond funds |
$2,924
|
$3,039
|
$115
|
Totals |
$88,054
|
$92,813
|
$4,759
|
a Detail may not total due to rounding. Special funds | amounts do not include | Local Public Safety Fund. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
(In Millions)
Current Dollars | Constant Dollars | |||
Percent | Percent | |||
Amount | Change | Amount | Change | |
1989-90 |
$39,456
|
9.9%
|
$39,456
|
5.5%
|
1990-91 |
40,264
|
2.0
|
38,515
|
-2.4
|
1991-92 |
43,327
|
7.6
|
40,523
|
5.2
|
1992-93 |
40,948
|
-5.5
|
37,391
|
-7.7
|
1993-94 |
38,958
|
-4.9
|
34,805
|
-6.9
|
1994-95 |
41,961
|
7.7
|
36,440
|
4.7
|
1995-96 |
45,393
|
8.2
|
38,406
|
5.4
|
1996-97 |
49,088
|
8.1
|
40,638
|
5.8
|
1997-98 |
52,874
|
7.7
|
43,015
|
5.9
|
1998-99 |
57,827
|
9.4
|
46,272
|
7.6
|
1999-00 | ||||
Governor's budget (January 10) |
$65,856
|
13.9%
|
$51,264
|
10.8%
|
Senate Committee |
66,146
|
14.4
|
51,490
|
11.3
|
2000-01 | ||||
Governor's budget (January 10) |
$68,819
|
4.5%
|
$52,161
|
1.8%
|
Senate Committee |
73,418
|
11.0
|
55,647
|
8.1
|
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
(In Millions)
Governor | Senate | Difference | |
Deficit Reduction |
--
|
$505
|
$505
|
PERS Buyback |
--
|
495
|
495
|
Beginning Teacher Salaries |
$50
|
225
|
175
|
Supplemental Instruction |
483
|
646
|
163
|
Merit Scholarship (Non-Proposi- | |||
tion 98) |
117
|
117
|
--
|
Teacher Recruitment and | |||
Retention |
77
|
--
|
-77
|
Education Technology Grants |
175
|
--
|
-175
|
Digital Middle School for | |||
Grades 4-8 |
--
|
175
|
175
|
• The Senate version spends $26.5 billion from the General Fund for Proposition 98 K-12 programs. This is $1.3 billion more than proposed in the Governor’s January budget.
• The Senate version provides $1 billion in additional revenue limit funding: $505 million to reduce the revenue limit “deficit” and $495 million for a buyback of the PERS employer contribution rate.
• The Senate version adds $175 million to augment beginning teacher salaries under the provisions of SB 1598 O’Connell).
• The Senate augmented the budget for supplemental instructional programs by $163 million, consolidated three remedial programs into a single funding allocation, and removed the statutory limits on the amount of instruction for which school districts may claim state funding, in accordance with SB 1324 (Escutia).
• The Senate version deletes $77.3 million provided in the Governor’s budget for teacher recruitment and retention in low-performing schools pending Senate Education Committee action on SB 1505 (Alarcon), the bill carrying the initiatives.
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
The Senate version provides an additional $420 million in ongoing funds and $187 million in one-time funds to higher education.
University of California
• $12 million to reduce summer fees to fall levels.
California State University
• $19 million for additional 1 percent compensation increase (total of 6 percent).
• $12 million to reduce summer fees to fall levels.
• $10 million for start-up costs at the Channel Islands campus.
California Community Colleges
• $80 million for Human Infrastructure Program.
• $70 million for Partnership for Excellence Program.
• $39 million for additional 1 percent enrollment growth (total of 4 percent).
• $15 million for funding equalization.
Student Aid Commission
• $48 million to expand the Cal Grant Program.
• $60 million to increase the size of Cal Grant awards.
• $10 million to restore the Cal Grant T Program.
University of California
• $30 million for deferred maintenance and library materials.
California State University
• $30 million for equipment.
• $11.3 million for Stockton off-campus center.
California Community Colleges
• $110 million for instructional equipment and scheduled maintenance.
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Senate
|
|||
Issue | Governor | Committee Action | Fiscal Impact |
Flood control subventions | • Proposes $44 million. | • Augmented by | • $68 million cost. |
$68 million. | |||
Set-aside to increase | • Provides $10 million. | • Denied proposal. | • $10 million savings. |
water supply deliveries | |||
to local agencies | |||
Public Library Foundation | • Proposes $56.9 million in | • Augmented program by | • $15.3 million cost. |
funding. | $15.3 million. | ||
County Medical Services | • Proposes to permanently | • Eliminated $20.2 million | • No impact in |
Program | eliminate $20.2 million Gen- | General Fund for | budget year. |
eral Fund appropriation. | 2000-01 only. | ||
Disproportionate Share | • Includes funding to backfill | • Approved full $30 million. | • -- |
Hospital “administrative | up to $30 million reduction in | ||
fee” | fee revenues (county fees). | ||
Citizens’ Option for Public | • $121 million including | • Approved contingent | •-- |
Safety (COPS) | $21 million in additional fund- | upon enactment of legis- | |
ing, and extended for five | lation to extend program. | ||
years. | Senate version of trailer | ||
bill extends for two years. | |||
Public Safety Equipment | • $100 million for law enforce- | • Deleted Funding. | • $100 million savings. |
Grants | ment/school safety technol- | ||
ogy grants. | |||
Local Government Fiscal | • No proposal. | • Provided $1.5 billion in | • $1.5 billion cost. |
Relief | various subventions and | ||
competitive grants to | |||
local governments. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Issue | Governor | Action | Fiscal Impact |
CalWORKs | |||
Maintenance-of-effort | • Does not count health care | • Recognizes $49.9 million in | • Achieves savings |
(MOE) spending | expenditures toward satisfy- | health care expenditures as | of $49.9 million by |
ing the federal MOE require- | countable towards the MOE | substituting TANF | |
ment. | requirement. | funds for General | |
Funds. | |||
Federal TANF Funds | • Provides TANF reserve of | • Reduced TANF spending due | • Increases TANF |
Reserve | $45.5 million. | to overbudgeting. | reserve by |
$124.6 million. a | |||
Child care reserve | • Holds back $69.4 million in | • Provides all estimated Stage 2 | • Allocates |
Stage 2 funds and places an | funds to State Department of | $69.4 million in | |
additional $81 million in | Education for allocation to | proposed Stage 2 | |
reserve. | Alternative Payment providers. | "hold back" funds. | |
• Approved $81 million reserve. | |||
Employment Development | |||
Caregiver training: (See | "Aging With Dignity" table, page | 14.) | |
Food Stamps | |||
California Food Assis- | • Follows current law and | • Eliminates sunset of expanded | • $6.1 million cost in |
tance Program for legal | funds expanded program for | program for post-August 1996 | budget year. |
noncitizens | post-August 1996 immi- | immigrants. | |
grants through | • Ongoing cost of | ||
September 30, 2000 at | about $8.1 million. | ||
which time program sunsets. | |||
a Federal Temporary Assistance | for Needy Families (TANF) funds. |
Cash Assistance | • Follows current law whereby | • Eliminates sunset of | • No impact in budget |
Program for | expanded program for post-Au- | expanded program for | year. |
Immigrants | gust 1996 immigrants sunsets in | post-August 1996 immi- | • Cost of roughly |
September 2000. | grants. | $100 million in | |
2001-02, increasing | |||
significantly thereafter. | |||
Foster Care | |||
Cost-of-Living-Ad- | • No proposal for foster family | • Provided COLA to foster | • $12.3 million cost. |
justment (COLA) | homes or group homes. | family homes and group | |
homes. | |||
In-Home Supportive | Services | ||
Public Authority | • Provides $48 million to increase | • Augmented by | • $56.4 million cost. |
wage increase | hourly wage to $6.60 (85 cents | $56.4 million to increase | |
above minimum wage). | hourly wage to $7.50 | ||
($1.75 above minimum | |||
wage). | |||
Health benefits for | • No proposal. | • Augmented by | • $50 million cost. |
service providers | $50 million to provide | ||
health benefits for unin- | |||
sured service providers. | |||
Department of Aging | |||
Long-Term Care Innovation | Grants: (See "Aging With Dignity" | table, page 14.) | |
Community-based | • Provides $84 million for various | • Augmented to expand | • $10 million cost. |
programs expansion | programs, including Alzheimer | programs listed under | |
Day Resource Centers; Adult Day | Governor's proposal. | ||
Health Care Linkages; Foster | |||
Grandparents; Senior Compan- | |||
ion; Respite Care; Ombudsman; | |||
Home Delivered Meals; Brown | |||
Bag. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Issue | Governor | Action | Fiscal Impact |
Medi-Cal | |||
Eligibility for families | • No changes proposed. | • Reduced eligibility reporting | • $46.6 million cost. |
and children | interval from quarterly to semi- | ||
annually, eliminated asset | |||
limit, and covered former fos- | |||
ter care children. | |||
Eligibility for elderly, | • Increases income limit to | • Increased income limit to | • $21.1 million cost. |
blind, and disabled | 100 percent of poverty | 133 percent of poverty level. | |
level. | |||
Disproportionate | • Includes funding to backfill | • Approved full $30 million. | • -- |
share hospital | up to $30 million reduction | ||
"administrative fee" | in charges to counties. | ||
Medi-Cal Provider | • Proposes 245 additional | • Approved 182.2 positions | • $2.1 million savings. |
Fraud | staff and $8.3 million (plus | (reduced by 62.8 positions). | |
$12.4 million federal funds) | |||
to reduce Medi-Cal fraud. | |||
Dental examinations | • No changes proposed. | • Expanded benefit to two basic | • $8.3 million cost. |
Basic exam covered on | exams per year. | ||
initial visit only. | |||
Children's hospitals | • No changes proposed (no | • Augmented for equipment and | • $12 million cost. |
separate budget allocation). | capital improvement. | ||
Provider Rates: (See Separate | Table.) | • $159.2 million cost. | |
Public Health | |||
Asthma Program | • No separate program. | • Established a state-funded | • $9 million cost. |
asthma program. | |||
HIV/AIDS programs | • Provides $258.2 million all | • Augmented for various activi- | • $14.8 million cost. |
funds ($115.9 million Gen- | ties. | ||
eral Fund). | |||
Dental Infrastructure | • Provides $6 million General | • Augmented for dentalinfra- | • $15 million |
for Community-Based | Fund for general infrastruc- | structure of community-based | (one-time) cost. |
Clinics | ture grants to qualifying | clinics. | |
clinics. | |||
Safe Drinking Water | • Proposes $92.5 million all | • Appropriated bond funds | • $15.4 million |
State Revolving Fund | funds ($15.4 million Gen- | ($33 million to cover two years | savings. |
eral Fund) for loans and | match for federal funds) in lieu | ||
grants to public water sys- | of General Fund. | ||
tems' capital improvements. | |||
Various community- | • Provides $44.6 million all | • Augmented from the General | • $19.6 million cost. |
based clinic programs | funds ($36.7 million Gen- | Fund. | |
eral Fund). |
Public health | • Provides $1.6 million ($1 million | • Augmented by $9.5 million | • $9.5 million cost. |
subvention | General Fund). | General Fund. | |
California Children's | • Proposes nine additional case | • Augmented by 24 positions for | • $7.8 million cost. |
Services | management positions. Main- | workload and enhancements | |
tains current eligibility limit | and increased income eligibility | ||
($40,000 annual income). | to 300 percent of poverty level. | ||
Substance Abuse | |||
Adult treatment | • Provides $86 million through | • Augmented to expand adult | • $10 million cost. |
various treatment programs for | treatment services. | ||
adults and children. | |||
Adolescent treatment | • Provides $86 million through | • Augmented to expand youth | • $10 million cost. |
various treatment programs for | treatment services; expanded | ||
adults and children. | Adolescent Treatment Pro- | ||
gram (AB 1784, Baca) from | |||
20 to 58 counties. | |||
Developmental Services | |||
Direct care staff-- | • No changes proposed. | • Augmented to provide a | • $42 million cost. |
wage increase | 20 percent wage pass-through | ||
for day program and respite | |||
program direct care workers. | |||
Mental Health | |||
Integrated services | • Includes $20 million for continu- | • Augmented by $34 million. | • $34 million cost. |
for the homeless | ation and expansion of AB 34 | ||
(Steinberg) demonstration projects. | |||
Supportive housing | • Continues $1 million for Sup- | • Augmented to expand housing | • $25 million cost. |
portive Housing Initiative Act. | options for low-income individ- | ||
uals with health problems. | |||
Children's System | • Provides $29 million total funds | • Provided full funding in all | • $15.5 million cost. |
of Care | for 50 counties. | counties. | |
Alternative residential | • No proposal. | • Augmented to develop resi- | • $10 million cost. |
treatment | dential alternatives to Institu- | ||
tions for Mental Disease. | |||
Suicide prevention | • No proposal. | • Provided $5.5 million for suicide | • $13.5 million cost. |
and crisis stabilization | prevention and $8 million for | ||
crisis stabilization assistance. | |||
General mental | • Provides $290 million General | • Set aside funds for increased | • $200 million cost. |
health treatment | Fund for community mental | mental health treatment ser- | |
health treatment. | vices. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Governor's Budget Proposal | Senate Action | Fiscal Impact |
Community Programs | ||
Caregiver tax credit--$47 million revenue loss. | • No specific action, but assumes | -- |
revenue loss. | ||
In-Home Supportive Services--$48 million to | • Augmented by $56.4 million to | $106.4 million cost. |
increase caregiver hourly wage to $6.60 per hour | increase hourly wage to $7.50 | |
in Public Authorities. | (Public Authorities), and by | |
$50 million for health benefits (all | ||
workers). | ||
Medi-Cal--$2.4 million to increase income limit | • Increased income limit to 133 | • $21.1 million cost |
for aged, blind, or disabled beneficiaries to 100 | percent of poverty level. | |
percent of the poverty level. | ||
Department of Aging--$20 million for long-term | • Reduced innovation grants by | • $10 million savings. |
care innovation grants. | $10 million. | |
Department of Aging--$2 million for senior hous- | • Augmented by $0.05 million. | • $0.05 million cost. |
ing information and support center and for | ||
wellness education campaign. | ||
Improving Quality of Care and Enforcement | ||
Employment Development Department-- | • Reduced by $25 million. | • $25 million savings |
$50 million ($35 million General Fund; $15 mil- | (offset by other in- | |
lion federal funds) to recruit, train, and retain | creases for welfare- | |
nursing assistants. | to-work activities) to | |
meet federal | ||
maintenance-of-effort | ||
requirement. | ||
Medi-Cal--$32.5 million for 5 percent pay in- | • Augmented to provide 10 percent | • $47.8 million cost. |
crease for nursing home direct-care workers. | increase and also include support | |
staff. | ||
Medi-Cal--$8 million for nursing home quality | • Approved amount and required | •-- |
awards. | criteria to be developed in con- | |
junction with stakeholders. | ||
Department of Health Services--$8.2 million for | • Approved as budgeted. | • -- |
additional nursing home inspection and enforce- | ||
ment activities |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
(In Millions)
Amounta
|
|
Medi-Cal | |
Long-term care-10 percent wage pass-through for both direct care and support staff |
$47.8
|
(amount above $32.4 million included in Governor’s budget for a 5 percent wage pass- | |
through for direct care staff only). | |
Dental-funding equivalent to average increase of 15 percent. |
38.5
|
Emergency and On-Call Physicians--Increase by approximately 100 percent (replaces |
25.2
|
Governor’s budget proposal for $24.8 million Proposition 99 allocation to counties). | |
California Children’s Services (primarily Medi-Cal)--Increase physician rates by 86 percent |
23.1
|
(to average of Medicare rates). | |
Home Health Services--12.5 percent rate increase. |
10.5
|
Nonemergency medical transportation--25 percent rate increase. |
6.0
|
Pap smears--100 percent increase. |
5.5
|
Small and rural hospitals--Increase outpatient supplemental rate up to 41 percent. |
2.0
|
Mammography--35 percent increase. |
0.6
|
Other Health Programs | |
Adolescent Family Life Program--15.6 percent increase. |
$3.0
|
Genetically Handicapped Persons Program--10.6 percent increase. |
2.9
|
Foster Care | |
COLAs--2.96 percent increase. |
$12.3
|
Child care supplement. |
2.8
|
Full CNI adjustment for counties above maximum. |
0.5
|
Other Social Services | |
In-Home Supportive Services--Increase hourly wages in Public Authorities from $6.60 |
$56.4
|
(Governor's proposal) to $7.50. | |
Developmental services (community-based)--day programs and respite programs-- |
42.0
|
20 percent increase for direct care staff. | |
Access Assistance for the Deaf--3 percent COLA. |
0.2
|
Grand Total |
$279.3
|
a General Fund amounts above Governor's budget. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Senate | Fiscal | |||
Issue | Governor | Action | Impact | |
Judicial/Executive | ||||
Trial Court Funding | ||||
• Juror fees | • Increased fees from $5 | • | • Augmented to increase fees | • $28.4 million cost. |
per day to $12 per day. | to $25 per day. | |||
Secretary for Youth and Adult | Correctional Agency | |||
• Study of Hepatitis C in | • No proposal. | • | • Augmented to conduct epide- | • $5.2 million cost. |
prisons and Youth | miological investigation of | |||
Authority facilities | prevalence of Hepatitis C and | |||
provide additional treatment | ||||
services. | ||||
Office of Inspector General | ||||
• Workload increases | • Provides $2.7 million | • | • Augmented by 25 additional | • $2.3 million cost. |
(30 positions). | positions to establish adminis- | |||
tration and management anal- | ||||
ysis and compliance units. | ||||
Department of Justice | ||||
• California Gang, Crime, | • Provides $3 million to | • | • Approved and augmented by | • $3 million cost. |
and Violence Prevention | continue existing pro- | additional $3 million for addi- | ||
Partnership Program | gram. | tional grants. | ||
Youth and Adult Corrections | ||||
Department of Corrections | ||||
• Inmate and parole | • Proposed full funding. | • | • Reduced request to reflect | • $14 million savings. |
caseload | more recent trends. | |||
• Parole supervision and | • Provides $10.4 million | • | • Approved request and aug- | • $10.4 million cost. |
services for | (142 positions) to pro- | mented for additional services | ||
“second strikers” | vide intensive parole | for these parolees. | ||
supervision. |
Youth and Adult Corrections | |||
Department of Corrections | |||
• Offender Information | • No proposal. | • Augmented for planning activities | • $7.5 million cost. |
System | and pilot projects for new infor- | ||
mation system. | |||
• Contract medical | • Proposed full funding. | • Reduced request to account for | • $5.3 million savings. |
services | slower growth in prison popula- | ||
tion. | |||
• Hepatitis C | • No proposal. | • Augmented to provide additional | • $5 million cost. |
services for inmates infected with | |||
Hepatitis C. | |||
• Parolee casework | • No proposed | • Augmented to provide additional | • $5 million cost. |
services | augmentation. | resources to assist parolees | |
transition back into communities. | |||
• Parole classification | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish three- | • $5 million cost. |
project | year pilot program to focus parole | ||
supervision and services on high- | |||
risk offenders. | |||
• Parolee outpatient | • Provides $3.4 million to | • Augmented to provide intensive | • $4 million cost. |
clinics and sex | expand staff at existing | services and specialized supervi- | |
offender containment | clinics. | sion of high-risk sex offenders. | |
program | |||
• Global Positioning | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish three- | • $3 million cost. |
System Pilot Project | year pilot project to monitor and | ||
track criminal offenders in com- | |||
• Transitional case | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish new | • $2.2 million cost. |
management program | program. | ||
for mentally ill | |||
parolees | |||
Board of Corrections | |||
• Federal funds for | • No proposal. | • Augmented to use funds for | • $40 million cost |
construction of county | county facilities. | (federal funds). | |
juvenile detention | |||
facilities | |||
• Juvenile Challenge | • No proposal. | • Augmented to extend existing | • $25 million cost. |
Grant Programs | pilot projects. |
• Developing Increased | • No proposal. | • Augmented to provide grants | • $18 million cost. |
Safety through Arms Recov- | to local law enforcement agen- | ||
ery Management (DISARM) | cies to reduce probationers' | ||
Teams | access to guns. | ||
• Global Positioning System | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish pro- | • $8 million cost. |
Pilot Project | jects in eight counties to moni- | ||
tor and track criminal offend- | |||
ers in communities. | |||
• Hand-held device computer | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish pilot | • $7 million cost. |
pilot project | project for law enforcement | ||
agencies in four counties. | |||
• Automated Offender Re- | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish pro- | • $3.5 million cost. |
porting Kiosk Pilot Project | jects in five counties. | ||
• Repeat Offender Prevention | • No proposal. | • Augmented to provide a fourth | • $4 million cost. |
Program (ROPP) | year of funding for project. | ||
Department of the Youth Authority | |||
• Substance abuse and men- | • No proposal. | • Augmented to provide addi- | • $8.1 million cost. |
tal health treatment services | tional services and meet all | ||
for wards and parolees | identified caseload needs. | ||
• Global Positioning System | • No proposal. | • Augmented to establish three- | • $1 million cost. |
Pilot Project | year pilot project to monitor | ||
and track criminal offenders in | |||
communities. | |||
General Government | |||
Office of Criminal Justice Planning | |||
• Law enforcement | • Provides $100.2 million | • Rejected. | • $100.2 million |
equipment grants | for competitive grants to | savings. | |
local law enforcement | |||
agencies. | |||
• Elder Abuse Vertical Prose- | • Provides $8.5 million for | • Reduced to reflect partial-year | • $4.5 million |
cution, High Technology | continuation of pro- | implementation of programs. | savings. |
Theft Apprehension, Rural | grams. | ||
Crime Prevention Programs |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Issue | Governor | Action | Fiscal Impact |
Ongoing state park | • Provides $3 million. | • Augmented by $12 million. | • $12 million cost. |
maintenance | |||
Department of Fish and | • Provides $79.9 million for | • Augmented by $31.6 million | • $31.6 million cost. |
Game--support | support of various programs. | (203 PYs). | |
Fire suppression | • Provides $55 million for | • Approved as budgeted. | • No change from |
emergency fire suppres- | budget. | ||
sion. | |||
Computer-aided fire | • Reverts $12.8 million due | • Approved Finance letter. | • No change from |
dispatch system | to project delay. | budget. | |
Local flood control | • Provides $44 million. | • Augmented by $68 million. | • $68 million cost. |
subventions | |||
Water storage studies | • Provides $20 million. | • Denied proposal. | • $20 million |
savings. | |||
Set aside to increase water | • Provides $10 million. | • Denied proposal. | • $10 million |
deliveries to local agencies | savings. | ||
Old school bus | • Provides $50 million. | • Approved as budgeted. | • No change from |
replacement | budget. | ||
Sustainable agriculture | • Provides $1 million to | • Augmented by $5.2 million | • $12 million cost. |
research grants | Department of Pesticide | (and an additional | |
Regulation ($1.5 million | $6.8 million in the | ||
all funds). | Department of Food and | ||
Agriculture). | |||
Hazardous substance | • Provides $7.7 million | • Augmented by $10 million | • $10 million cost. |
“orphan site” cleanup | (special funds). | (General Fund). | |
Brownfields redevelopment | • No proposal. | • Augmented by $5 million. | • $5 million cost. |
technical assistance grants | |||
Diesel emissions reduction: | |||
• Incentives program | • No proposal. | • Augmented by $50 million. | • $50 million cost. |
• Agricultural and off-road | • No proposal. | • Augmented by $25 million | • $25 million cost |
sources | |||
Alternative fuel | • $9.9 million (special funds | • Augmented by $25 million | • $25 million cost. |
infrastructure | in Energy Commission and | (General Fund in Air Re- | |
DGS). | sources Board). | ||
Plans (“TMDLs”) to address | • $6.9 million ($10.8 million | • Augmented by $5 million | • $5 million cost. |
pollution in impaired water | all funds). | ||
bodies | |||
Stormwater runoff control | • $500,000 ($6.1 million all | • Augmented by $7.5 million. | • $7.5 million cost. |
funds). | |||
Hazardous waste pollution | • No proposal. | • Augmented by $10 million. | • $10 million cost. |
prevention grants to local | |||
governments |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE
Issue | Governor | Action | Fiscal Impact |
Intercity and | • Provides $121 million for | • Approved as budgeted. | • No change from |
commuter rail | passenger rail improvements. | budget. | |
Abandoned Railroad | • No proposal. | • Provided $10 million to ac- | • $10 million cost. |
Account | quire inactive railroad rights | ||
of way. | |||
San Francisco Bay | • Provides $12 million (PTA) | • Provided $12 million (General | • $12 million GF |
Area Water Transit | for planning a ferry transit | Fund [GF]), with half of the | cost, $12 million |
Authority | system. | amount contingent on receipt | PTA savings. |
of work plan. | |||
California Highway | • Provides $1.6 million (MVA) | • Augmented by $24.9 million | • $24.9 million |
Patrol (CHP)-- | for 15 officers for a traffic | (MVA) for approximately 268 | (MVA) cost. |
patrol officers | congestion pilot project. | additional officers to patrol | |
congested and rural highway | |||
segments. | |||
CHP--protective | • Provides $14.5 million | • Deleted MVA funding, and | • $14.5 million |
services | (MVA) and $15 million (GF). | replaced with GF instead. | savings to MVA, |
$14.5 million cost | |||
to GF. |
LEGISLATIVE ANALYST ’ S OFFICE