Legislative Analyst's Office, January 15, 1998

Overview of the 1998-99
Governor's Budget


The Program On January 9, 1998, the Governor submitted his proposed 1998-99 budget plan. This brief discusses the proposal's major features and some of the key issues and considerations that the Legislature will face in crafting a budget which reflects its priorities.
LAO Findings
  • Budget Outlook Positive. The budgetary outlook for 1998-99 is more positive than any time since the late 1980s. This is primarily due to continued strong revenue growth and declining Medi-Cal and CalWORKs caseloads.
  • Budget Funds Most Current-Law Requirements. The budget fully funds caseload growth, as well as the various agreements reached last year. The budget does not, however, provide funding for the restoration of the renters' credit, or certain social services-related grant restorations and cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).
  • What Are the Budget's New Proposals? Most of the budget's significant new proposals are in the areas of education and infrastructure. For example, a lengthening of the K-12 school year is proposed, as well as $7 billion in bonds to finance capital outlay needs involving education, prisons, and resources.
  • More Revenues Are Likely. We believe that revenues in the current and budget years combined will exceed the budget forecast by at least $500 million. In contrast to last year, when most of the unanticipated revenues went to Proposition 98, the additional revenues we foresee can be used for non-Proposition 98 purposes.
  • Legislature Has Unusual Opportunity to Address Priorities. This likelihood of additional revenues means the Legislature can allocate a significant amount of funds strategically to meet its own priorities. For example, the Legislature could: increase the budgetary reserve, fund high-priority infrastructure needs through direct appropriations, or address other spending and tax-policy priorities.
 

OVERVIEW OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET

The new budget proposes total state spending of $70.6 billion (excluding the expenditure of federal funds and selected bond funds), which is up 4.7 percent from the current year's budget. This total includes $55.4 billion in General Fund spending (a 4.5 percent increase from the current year) and $15.2 billion in special funds spending (a 5.3 percent increase).

The General Fund's "Bottom Line" Condition

Figure 1 shows General Fund revenues, expenditures, and the year-end budgetary reserve for both 1997-98 and 1998-99. It shows that both the current and budget years are expected to end with a relatively modest reserve of around $300 million a bit over one-half of 1 percent of General Fund revenues.

General Fund Spending by Program

Figure 2 shows how spending from the state's General Fund is allocated among major program areas. It shows that education funding accounts for over one-half of the total. Health and social services accounts for slightly more than one-fourth, spending on youth and adult corrections represents about 8 percent of the budget, and all other programs account for the remaining 10 percent of General Fund spending.

Key Programmatic Features

As noted above, the new budget plan reflects the major agreements reached last year in the areas of welfare reform, education, state tax relief, and the financial restructuring of California's trial court system. In terms of new proposals, the budget contains no tax changes and relatively few major programmatic changes. As indicated in Figure 3, the main changes are in the area of K-12 education, where the Governor is proposing an increase in the length of the school year to 180 days. The budget proposes the elimination of the renters' credit (which was suspended from 1993 through 1997). It also proposes to make permanent certain welfare grant reductions and COLA suspensions.

Figure 3
Key Programmatic Features of the Budget Proposal
Taxes Includes no new tax-related changes.
Education Provides funds for lengthened K-12 school year. Proposes funds to higher education to cover fourth year of Governor's "compact" with California State University (CSU) and University of California (UC), as well as enrollment growth.
Welfare Makes permanent the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs') 4.9 percent grant reduction and permanently suspends certain welfare COLA adjustments. Uses federal funds to support large increase in spending for CalWORKs' job training and child care services.
Infrastructure Proposes $7 billion in bonds for K-12 school facilities, higher education, correctional facilities, local infrastructure bank, resources, and other purposes.
Corrections Proposes full funding for caseload increases.
Other Programs Eliminates renters' credit. Provides funds for equivalent of 3 percent COLA for state employees. Pays off interest relating to Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) lawsuit.


ECONOMIC AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS--
MODERATE GROWTH

Among the most important assumptions underlying the proposed budget are its economic and revenue projections. In both of these areas, moderate growth is assumed.

Continued Though Slowing Economic Expansion

The budget assumes ongoing national economic expansion in 1998 and 1999, accompanied by continued, though tapering, moderate economic growth with modest inflation in California. Figure 4 summarizes the key elements in the budget's national and state economic forecasts. It indicates that growth in California personal income and employment both key determinants of state revenues are projected to grow by 6.3 percent in 1998 and 6 percent in 1999, and 2.8 percent in 1998 and 2.3 percent in 1999, respectively. Figure 5 shows that while this expected growth represents a slowing from 1997's robust performance, solid economic performance is anticipated.

The budget's economic forecast is generally consistent with recent projections made by other economists and our own forecast made last November, although certain developments have occurred since the budget forecast was prepared.

Asian Financial Problems. The unsettled financial situation associated with Asian economies clearly represents some downside risk to the budget's economic forecast. The forecast already has incorporated downward adjustments for the Asian situation through December, especially in its projections for export-related industries. However, conditions in the region have continued to deteriorate since the budget forecast was prepared, posing additional risk to California's outlook.

Recent Housing Market Strength. On the positive side, recent favorable housing market developments are working to improve the state's near-term economic prospects relative to the forecast. For example, home sales are booming, in part spurred by recent reductions in interest rates, and new construction activity is climbing.

We will be providing the Legislature with our own updated economic forecast in February's Perspectives and Issues (P&I), which will incorporate developments since the budget was prepared.

Moderate Revenue Growth

After a healthy increase in the current year, the budget assumes that moderate revenue growth will occur in 1998-99, consistent with the moderate gains projected for the economy. As shown in Figure 6, General Fund revenues are expected to total $52.9 billion (7.5 percent growth) in the current year and $55.4 billion (4.7 percent growth) in the budget year.

The budget does not contain any new tax-related proposals, but the revenue forecast does incorporate the effects of the state's 1997 tax relief package, including an increased personal income tax dependent exemption credit. The fiscal effect of this package is to reduce revenues by $189 million in 1997-98 and $593 million in 1998-99 (reaching $1.1 billion in 1999-00). In its absence, 1998-99 revenue growth would have been modestly higher 5.5 percent.

The budget also assumes $85 million in 1998-99 revenues from federal adoption of a tax offset program (this program also has been assumed, but not adopted, in previous years).

How Is Revenue Growth Allocated? Figure 7 (see page 6) shows how the budget proposes to allocate the $2.5 billion in projected 1998-99 revenue growth. Somewhat over 40 percent ($1.1 billion) goes for K-12 education. Of the remainder, $0.6 billion goes to higher education, $0.4 billion goes to health and social services, and $0.3 billion goes to corrections-related spending. The final $0.1 billion is a net figure which includes a variety of offsetting elements, including a drop of over $0.7 billion in payments to the PERS fund (reflecting reduced payments in the budget year associated with the PERS court settlement), an increase of $0.5 billion for trial court funding (due to the financial restructuring agreement), $142 million for a state employee pay increase and over $100 million for state infrastructure.

Recent Cash Trends Have Been Strong. In December, cash receipts exceeded the 1997-98 Budget Act forecast by over $650 million, more than offsetting the revenue softness that occurred earlier in the year. The Department of Finance, however, did not have this information fully available when it prepared the budget revenue forecast.

We Believe Revenues Are Understated. Our November revenue forecast for the current and budget years combined is over $500 million above the new budget estimate. The recent strength of year-end receipts, along with the continuing strength of withholding receipts, suggest that the revenue trend is at least as strong as our November projection. Given the way the Proposition 98 formula works, it also appears that most of these added revenues could be used for non-Proposition 98 purposes. Thus, the Legislature will have the flexibility to allocate such additional monies to what it feels are the state's highest priority needs. We will be providing the Legislature with our revised revenue forecast in our February P&I, which will take account of recent cash trends.

GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSALS BY PROGRAM AREA

Figure 8 shows General Fund spending by major program for fiscal years 1996-97 through 1998-99. The budget indicates that above-average increases are proposed for higher education and youth and adult corrections. Modest increases are proposed for Medi-Cal and "all other" programs. After growing sharply during 1995-96 through 1997-98, K-12 education funding is projected to increase at a moderate rate of 4.8 percent in the budget year.

General Fund spending on CalWORKs-related services is projected to decline while spending on several smaller health and welfare programs (specifically, In-Home Supportive Services, Regional Centers, and Developmental Centers) is proposed to increase significantly.

K-12 Education

The budget proposes moderate increases in K-12 education spending, consistent with Proposition 98 funding requirements. Specifically, total K-12 education expenditures in 1998-99 are proposed to increase $2 billion compared to the 1997-98 Budget Act (of which $1.7 billion would come from the General Fund).

How Are the New Monies Spent? Figure 9 (see page 8) displays the major uses of these additional funds. The largest share $657 million (33 percent)would provide a 2.2 percent COLA for district and county office revenue limits as well as for most categorical programs. General purpose and categorical program funding for the projected 1.7 percent growth in the student population accounts for $507 million, or 25 percent of available funds. The proposal to increase the length of the school year to 180 days (also known as "staff development day buy-out") accounts for another $350 million, or 17 percent. Major increases for child care programs ($168 million), deferred maintenance ($135 million), and various other categorical programs use the remaining 25 percent of new
K-12 funds.

The COLA Issue. The significant amount of discretionary funds that are available in 1998-99 is due in part to a proposal by the Governor regarding the K-12 revenue limit COLA. Because of a revision of past-year data in the inflation index used to calculate this adjustment, existing law calls for a 4 percent COLA. The budget, however, proposes to fund a 2.2 percent COLA, which costs about $500 million less. The 2.2 percent figure represents inflation over the prior year. We will review both the requirements of current law and the Governor's proposal, and comment on them in our upcoming Analysis.

Other Proposals. Figure 10 identifies several additional major K-12 education proposals. These proposals would have costs for local school districts. The dollar impact on the proposed state budget, however, is minor. The Opportunity Scholarship program is even projected to save the state's General Fund about $40 million. This is because the budget assumes that all 15,000 students using the scholarships would attend private school. This reduces the minimum funding guarantee under Proposition 98 by about $92 million. The budget proposes to spend $52 million in non-Proposition 98 General Fund monies (or about $3,500 per student) for the scholarships.

Figure 10
Other Major K-12 Proposals
Opportunity Scholarships Allows 15,000 students attending the lowest performing schools in the state to attend a private school or other public school.
Instructional Minutes Lengthens the school day at most middle schools and high schools by requiring schools to exclude the time between class periods (known as "passing time") from district calculations of instructional time.
Social Promotion Prohibits students who cannot achieve a passing score on a state assessment test to proceed to the next grade.
Mandated Use of Lottery Funds Directs school districts to use the projected $99 million increase in Lottery funds for textbooks.

Higher Education

Community Colleges. The budget proposes total spending for community colleges of $3.9 billion, of which $2.3 billion would come from the General Fund. This is a 6.8 percent increase in total spending (an 8.6 percent increase in General Fund spending). The total increase includes $90 million for enrollment growth, $50 million in incentive funding based on specific performance measures for colleges, and funding for various investments in technology and infrastructure.

University of California and California State University. The budget proposes General Fund spending of $2.4 billion for UC and $2.1 billion for CSU in 1998-99, representing increases of 8 percent and 8.6 percent, respectively, from the current year. The budget provides funding for the fourth year of the Governor's compact with higher education. It also provides funding for additional enrollment at CSU, and the "buyout" of the 5 percent student fee reduction for UC and CSU required by legislation passed in 1997. The UC budget also includes planning funds for a tenth campus at Merced.

Health and Social Services

The budget proposes $15.1 billion in General Fund spending for health and social services programs in 1998-99, a 2.5 percent increase from the current year. Figure 11 summarizes the fiscal effects of major policy proposals included in the budget.

Figure 11
Major Health and Social Services Proposals
(In Millions)
Proposal Fiscal Effect
Permanently eliminate CalWORKs and SSI/SSP COLA's -$123
Make 4.9 percent CalWORKs grant reduction permanent -151
Enhance services for developmental centers and regional centers 51

California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs). The budget proposes $5.9 billion from all funding sources for CalWORKs in 1998-99, including $2 billion from the General Fund. This is an increase of $307 million in total funds, but an $88 million reduction in spending from the General Fund. The contrast between increased total spending and declining General Fund spending is due to the fact that a significant portion of CalWORKs spending in the budget year is funded by a large carryover balance of unexpended federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant funds from the current and prior years. The budget proposes to (1) make permanent the 4.9 percent grant reduction, resulting in a General Fund cost avoidance of $151 million; and (2) permanently eliminate the statutory COLA, resulting in a General Fund cost avoidance of $71 million.

Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Program (SSI/SSP). The budget proposes General Fund expenditures of $2.2 billion in 1998-99, an increase of 4.7 percent over the current year. This includes funding to cover a 3.1 percent projected increase in caseload ($70 million) and an increase in the federal administrative fee ($18 million). The budget proposes to make permanent the suspension of the state COLA, resulting in a General Fund cost avoidance of $52 million in 1998-99. Recent caseload declines in SSI/SSP indicate that state costs in this program will fall below the amounts envisioned in the new budget estimate.

Medi-Cal. The budget proposes General Fund expenditures of $6.8 billion for the Medi-Cal Program, a 0.6 percent increase over the current year. This includes a current-year savings of $210 million, primarily due to caseloads that are declining more rapidly than anticipated when the 1997-98 budget was enacted. According to the budget estimate, total Medi-Cal caseloads will decline by 257,000 (or 4.8 percent) in the current year, with the bulk of the decline involving the CalWORKs caseload. In 1998-99, the budget projects that caseload will decline by an additional 148,000 persons, or 2.9 percent, resulting in a General Fund savings of about $100 million. An increase in the federal matching rate for Medi-Cal will save an additional $65.8 million. However, these savings will essentially be offset by increases in the cost and utilization of services. The budget does not propose any major new changes in the Medi-Cal Program.

Healthy Families Program. The budget includes a total of $64.5 million from the General Fund in 1998-99 for the first year of operation of the new Healthy Families Program, which provides health care coverage to children in families with incomes up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level. Of this total, the budget proposes $33.3 million for the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to subsidize health insurance for children in families with incomes above Medi-Cal limits, $25.2 million for Medi-Cal eligibility expansions and outreach, and identifies $6 million in spending for existing child health programs that will be included in the program. Together with federal matching funds, total proposed spending for Healthy Families Program will be $201 million. By the end of 1998-99, the budget estimates that the program will cover 201,000 children in the insurance program, and extend Medi-Cal coverage to an additional
101,000 children.

Regional Centers and Developmental Centers. The budget proposes to fund caseload increases and enhanced services for developmentally disabled persons. This includes $114.9 million ($95 million General Fund, including Medi-Cal reimbursements) for caseload and cost increases, $40.4 million ($34.7 million General Fund, including reimbursements) for regional center clients placed in the community, and $31.1 million ($16.5 million General Fund, including reimbursements) for the first year of a four-year expansion of staffing for the developmental centers.

Youth and Adult Corrections

The budget includes $4.4 billion from the General Fund for youth and adult corrections, an 8 percent increase from the current year. The largest part is for support of the Department of Corrections at $3.9 billion, an increase of 7.2 percent. The budget provides full funding for caseload and workload changes in the department. The prison inmate population is projected to reach 171,610 by June 1999, a 6 percent increase from June of the current year. The budget proposes to significantly expand the state's use of contracting with private providers to house state prison inmates. Specifically, the budget proposes to contract for the first 5,000 beds out of a total of 15,000 beds in private corrections facilities in the budget year. The budget does not include any other significant new initiatives.

Infrastructure

The budget proposes $7 billion in bond sales over the next year to support infrastructure spending in several areas. The proposal includes $2 billion for K-12 schools. (The K-12 bonds are proposed as part of $8 billion in authorizations over the next four election cycles to cover capital outlay needs associated with enrollment growth and modernization of existing facilities.) The $7 billion proposal also includes $1 billion for higher education, $1.4 billion for correctional facilities, $1.3 billion for water projects, and $1.3 billion for other purposes.

In evaluating this proposal, we believe that the key issues for the Legislature to focus on are: (1) do the capital projects being proposed make sense and are they of high priority, (2) should bonds be used to finance them, and (3) how much debt service should future budgets be faced with? With regard to financial feasibility, we do not think this is a problem, in that the credit markets can easily absorb these bonds if their marketing is appropriately timed, and the state's debt-service ratio (currently 4.4 percent) would not rise above safe levels.

Other Programs

Trial Court Funding. The budget provides increases involving trial court funding consistent with the restructuring measure passed last year. Total General Fund spending for trial courts would reach $656 million in 1998-99.

Public Employees' Retirement System. Spending for PERS drops from $1.7 billion in the current year to $1 billion in 1998-99. Spending for both years includes the impacts of the PERS court settlement. The 1997-98 total includes the $1.2 billion payment of deferred principal contributions to the fund. In 1998-99, the budget includes $310 million to cover the interest on these deferred payments.

Renters' Credit. This credit, which provides a refundable tax credit of $60 to single renters and $120 to married couples and heads of households, has been suspended in each year since 1993. Under existing law, the credit is scheduled to be reinstated in 1998. The budget proposes to permanently eliminate the credit, for a budgetary savings of $540 million in 1998-99.

Local Government. The budget proposes a $200 million general obligation bond issue along with $50 million in direct General Fund spending to fund an infrastructure bank. Other than this proposal, the budget does not include any major new initiatives relating to local governments.

Employee Compensation. The budget includes sufficient funds for a 3 percent salary increase for state employees, effective July 1, 1998. The budget indicates this money is to fund any forthcoming employee compensation changes arrived at for 1998-99 through the collective bargaining process.

CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE LEGISLATURE

The January budget proposal reflects the Governor's priorities for 1998-99 regarding state revenues and spending. As always, the Legislature will have an opportunity to establish its priorities through the budget process over the next several months. In addition, it is likely that because of revenue increases beyond those identified in the budget, the Legislature will have discretion over at least $500 million of revenues beyond those earmarked in the Governor's proposal. In contrast to recent years, most of these additional monies could be used for the non-Proposition 98 portion of the budget. This combination of factors provides the Legislature with an unusual opportunity to allocate a significant amount of unanticipated funds strategically to meet its own priorities.

Options for Using Additional Funds. Naturally, there are many different competing needs and priorities facing the Legislature in allocating any additional resources. One option worth considering would be to "beef-up" the General Fund's budgetary reserve to a more meaningful level, given that its proposed level is only a fraction of 1 percent of the budget, and even a modest economic slowing could cause a fall-off in revenues of several hundreds of millions of dollars in just a few months. Other options include funding certain pressing one-time capital outlay needs through direct appropriations, reforming local government finance, and addressing various other spending and tax-policy priorities. The key point is that the Legislature may have an unusual opportunity to set policies to address its own priorities based on revenues beyond that envisioned in the budget.

Acknowledgements

This report was prepared by Brad Williams and David Vasché, with the assistance of many others throughout the office. The Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) is a nonpartisan office which provides fiscal and policy information and advice to the Legislature.
LAO Publications

To request publications call (916) 445-2375.
This report and others are available on the LAO's World Wide Web site at http:// www.lao.ca.gov.
The LAO is located at 925 L Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento, CA 95814.


Return to LAO Home Page