December 1997,Legislative Analyst's Office
California voters have increased their power over local government tax decisions. In the 1970s, the rapid rise in home values and the subsequent growth in property tax bills created the widespread desire to lower property taxes. This movement culminated in 1978 with the passage of Proposition 13, which reduced property tax revenues by more than 50 percent. In addition, Proposition 13 requires two-thirds voter approval for the passage of new local special taxes. Similar voter approval requirements have been extended over the past two decades for various other types of local revenue sources.
The Legislature has enacted major shifts of program responsibility and program funding over the past 25 years. In areas such as trial courts and health and welfare, the administration and funding of programs have been altered in an effort to increase efficiency and provide greater flexibility.
By giving state government the authority to allocate local property tax revenues, Proposition 13 placed the state in control of one of local governments' primary revenue sources. The two decades since the passage of Proposition 13 have seen the increasing interdependence of state and local fiscal policy and a significant loss of local flexibility. As a result, local governments must now try to respond to citizens' needs with limited fiscal flexibility.
(Major Milestones graphic is not available in .HTML, please see .PDF version.)Contact--Michael Cohen--Local Government Section--(916) 445-6442.
Slowdown in Asia Poses Risks
The much publicized economic and financial problems in Asia will have some impact on California in 1998, although the extent of the impact is difficult to determine at this time. Some exporters have already reported cutbacks in goods sold to these regions, and growth in total exports of California-produced goods slowed sharply in the first half of 1997, largely reflecting reductions in goods sold in Asia. While these slowdowns have thus far been offset by strength in other sectors of California's economy, a deepening crisis in Asia could have more significant impacts in this state. We will be monitoring these impacts in the months ahead.
The year-to-date shortfall is due to a combination of unusually large corporation tax refunds (which are mostly one-time in nature) and to lower-than-expected quarterly estimated payments from the personal income tax. We believe that the softness in quarterly payments is due to shifts in the timing of such payments, rather than an underlying slowdown in investment and business-related earnings. This is especially true given the current strength in the economy and the high financial-related earnings reported so far this year.
Given these factors, we believe that the underlying trend in revenues remains positive. We will have a better picture of the outlook in December and January. These months include both the last quarterly payments toward 1997 tax liabilities for individuals and corporations, and tax receipts related to retail sales during the key Christmas shopping period.
Contact--Brad Williams-- Fiscal Revenue and Economics Section--(916) 445-6061
California Update is published monthly--except January and February--by the Legislative Analyst's
The LAO is a nonpartisan office which provides fiscal and policy information and advice to the Legislature. The Legislative Analyst's Office is located at 925 L Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento, CA 95814.To request publications call (916) 445-2375. Reports are also available on the LAO's World Wide Web page at http://www.lao.ca.gov.
Return to LAO Home Page